‹ All setups

Candle Range Theory · three-candle trigger · New York AM · long or short

Three-Candle CRT

One candle marks the extreme. The next has to sweep it and close back inside. The third only matters if it breaks that sweep candle — and when it does, the target goes on first, with the stop dragged to force exactly 1.5R, every single trade.

3candles to the trigger
4filters
1.5Rfixed reward:risk, every trade

6 / 6

Watch one CRT long, start to finish

1

Set the bias on a higher timeframe first

  • Before looking for a single CRT trigger, mark the most extreme recent swing high or low on a higher timeframe and wait for price to sweep that level and reverse away from it.
  • Only once that higher-timeframe sweep-and-reversal has actually confirmed does a direction become tradeable — CRTs are taken with that bias, never against it.

A three-candle trigger without a confirmed higher-timeframe direction is just a pattern — the bias is what turns it into a trade.

2

Candle 1 marks the extreme — and nothing else

  • On the 1-hour, 30-minute, or 15-minute chart only, let one candle close and mark its high and low. That range is a reference level, not a signal to act on by itself.
  • The 1-minute chart never builds this candle — it has no role in forming the setup, only in timing an entry once the setup already exists.

Skip this step and there's no fixed range for candle 2 to sweep — the whole sequence loses its reference point.

3

Candle 2 is the sweep, not a breakout

  • The next candle has to wick beyond one side of candle 1's range — below the low for a long setup, above the high for a short — and then close back inside that range.
  • If it closes beyond the range instead of snapping back inside it, the setup is void. That's a breakout in the wrong structure, not a sweep.

The wick-and-close-back-in is what shows liquidity being taken and rejected. A candle that just closes through the level is trend continuation, not a CRT.

4

Candle 3 is the trigger — and it has a clock on it

  • Enter only when price breaks candle 2's high (long) or candle 2's low (short). Nothing before that break is a valid entry, no matter how convincing the sweep looked.
  • If candle 3 closes without breaking that level, the setup is dead. A fourth or later candle breaking the same level afterward is considered too low-quality to take.

Without the clock, "wait for the break" quietly turns into "wait indefinitely" — and a stale level breaking three or four candles later isn't the same trade anymore.

5

Choose the entry style before candle 3 forms

  • Direct break: enter the instant candle 3 crosses candle 2's level. More trades trigger, at a lower win rate.
  • Rebreak: wait for the initial break, a pullback, and a second break before entering — timed on the 1-minute chart. Fewer trades trigger, at a higher win rate.

Both are the same setup with a different entry filter layered on top — the choice is a trade-frequency decision, not a separate strategy.

6

Target first, then drag the stop to exactly 1.5R

  • The take-profit goes on first, at the opposing extreme — the higher-timeframe swing level the bias in step one was measured against.
  • The stop-loss is not a fixed point distance. It's dragged to whatever distance makes the trade exactly 1.5 times reward-to-risk, recalculated on every single trade.

Fix the stop first instead, and reward-to-risk becomes whatever the market happens to give you — the entire point of this setup is that it never is.

The three candles, on one chart

Candle 1 marks the extreme, candle 2 sweeps it and closes back inside, candle 3 breaks candle 2's high to trigger the long — target at the opposing extreme, stop dragged to exactly 1.5R.

target — opposing higher-timeframe extreme candle 1 low — the extreme (reference only) candle 2 high — the trigger level candle 1 candle 2 — sweeps, closes back in candle 3 — the break Higher-timeframe bias already confirmed bullish — this sweep is only tradeable long. Enter on the break of candle 2's high — stop dragged below entry to force exactly 1.5R against the target above. Target sits at the opposing extreme — set first, before the stop is even measured.

Direct break vs. rebreak

Same trigger level, two different entries — take the break the instant it happens, or wait for it to fail once and come back for a second, higher-conviction break.

Direct break candle 2 trigger level entry — break confirms Enters the instant candle 3 crosses the level. More trades trigger, lower win rate. Rebreak candle 2 trigger level initial break pullback entry — second break Waits for the break, the pullback, and a second break — timed on the 1-minute.

New York AM is the focus of this page

The three-candle trigger was described across three sessions in the source material — this page is built around the one it works best in.

New York AM · 9:30–12:00 ET

The session this page is built around. The highest-quality window for the trigger — real volume, real participants, real follow-through once candle 3 breaks.

Asian session · 8–10pm ET

Traded as a secondary window with the same three-candle mechanic in the source material — not the focus of this page.

London session

Described as the lowest-quality of the three sessions for this specific setup. Skip it for live trading; it's not covered further here.

The four filters

The three candles don't change — these are what keep you from forcing the trigger onto a chart, a day, or a timeframe it was never built for.

1  Building the setup on a 1-minute chart

The three candles only form on the 1-hour, 30-minute, or 15-minute chart. The 1-minute has exactly two jobs: timing a rebreak entry, and reading whether the tape is too choppy to trade.

Kills: a "setup" that was never actually built on a timeframe this trigger works on.

2  No higher-timeframe bias confirmed

Taking a CRT trigger before the higher-timeframe extreme has actually been swept and reversed — trading the pattern without the direction it depends on.

Kills: a mechanically correct trigger fighting the wrong side of the higher-timeframe move.

3  Low-volume, no-catalyst days

Especially Mondays — thin participation makes a sweep-and-reject mean far less, since there's no real liquidity being taken in the first place.

Kills: a technically valid sweep that has no real order flow behind it.

4  Choppy price action

Alternating massive-body and massive-wick candles with no follow-through between them — the market not settling into a real directional read.

Kills: a break that has nowhere to go because the tape has no follow-through left in it.

Target first, stop dragged to fit — not the other way around

The figures below are clean, illustrative numbers on MNQ (Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures) to show the sequence, not a specific trade called out in the source material.

Target — opposing extreme, set first45.00 pts
Stop — dragged to force exactly 1.5R (45 ÷ 1.5)30.00 pts
Position size — kept under a $500 risk cap8 MNQ
Total risk on the trade$480.00

The mistake this prevents

Setting the stop first — off a fixed number of points, or wherever feels comfortable — and only then seeing what reward-to-risk that happens to produce.

On a setup built around exactly 1.5R, a stop-first process turns disciplined math into a guess that drifts trade to trade.

Set the target at the opposing extreme first. Let the ratio — not a feeling — decide exactly where the stop sits.

Which futures actually fit this setup

Instrument fit as described in the source material — not a specific numeric worked trade, since none was given for a real ticker on a real date.

  NQ / MNQNasdaq-100 futures ES / MESS&P 500 futures MGCGold futures
Role in the source material The primary instrument — most of the setup's chart examples were built on it. Traded alongside NQ as a second index-futures option. Kept in rotation, but singled out as the weakest fit for this specific setup.
Timeframes Same rule across all three: 1-hour, 30-minute, or 15-minute to build the three candles; the 1-minute only for a rebreak entry or reading chop.
Described performance Called out as producing the best results of the three. Not singled out individually — grouped with NQ as an index-futures instrument. Called out as producing comparatively poor results.
Takeaway Default choice for this setup. A reasonable index-futures alternative to NQ. Keep it on watch, but don't expect NQ-level performance from it.

Example: one CRT long, 1-minute bars

An example session run through the indicator's own rules. Yesterday swept the 1-hour swing low and closed back above it, so the 1-hour bias is bullish. Candle 1 is the 9:30 15-minute candle (100.05–100.55). Candle 2, from 9:45, wicks under its low to 99.92 and closes back inside. Candle 3 breaks candle 2's high of 100.36 at 10:01, closes back under it, and breaks it again at 10:04 for the rebreak entry at 100.36. The target is candle 1's high at 100.55, the stop is dragged to 100.23 for exactly 1.5R, and the target is hit at 10:16. The bars are made up to show the setup clearly. They aren't a real ticker.

Loading chart…

1-minute

Watch the video

Mark the extreme, wait for the sweep, then trade the break at 1.5R.

Open on YouTube ›

Indicator for this setup

Add this to a TradingView chart to build the three CRT candles and mark the New York window this page describes. It draws and alerts on the setup — it does not place trades.

Mechanical trigger. Mechanical risk.

The setup is the same three candles every time, and the risk is the same exact ratio every time — there's no discretion left to second-guess once the trigger actually prints.

  • New York AM only, built on the 1-hour, 30-minute, or 15-minute chart — never build the three candles on a 1-minute chart.
  • Bias, then sweep, then break, in that order — skip the days with no real participation and the tape that won't settle.
  • Target first, stop dragged to force exactly 1.5R — never the other way around.

Model built around a three-candle Candle Range Theory (CRT) setup — mark the extreme, wait for the sweep-and-close-back-in, then trade only the break, sized to an exact 1.5 reward-to-risk ratio — as taught in a trading-education video, focused on the New York AM session. The risk figures above are clean, illustrative numbers on MNQ and are not from a specific trade named in that video. Watch the reference video →